ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

TRUST-ACE - Anticancer-treatment Cardiotoxicity Identification by Echocardiography

N

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Breast Neoplasm Malignant Primary

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: Comprehensive echocardiographic follow-up
Diagnostic Test: Simplified echocardiographic follow-up

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06310330
2019/1059

Details and patient eligibility

About

TRUST-ACE will compare a simplified echocardiographic protocol focusing on ventricular function with the guideline recommended comprehensive echocardiographic examination using a randomised design in follow-up of breast-cancer patients with respect to identification of cancer treatment related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD).

Secondly, the study will evaluate whether novel tools used to improve standardization of recordings as well as automated measurements of central measurements, e.g. ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) can improve the precision of echocardiography in daily clinical practice.

Full description

Cancer treatment related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a well-known complication to cancer treatment with implication both with respect to treatment and prognosis of the cancer as well as heart.

CTRCD, often named cardiotoxicity, usually refers to myocardial dysfunction and heart failure developing after administration of potentially cardiotoxic therapy. By precise diagnostics, adequate treatment can be started early to prevent heart failure and unnecessary discontinuation of the potential life-saving cancer treatment may be avoided. However, guideline advocated analyses of cardiac function (EF and GLS) by echocardiography are time consuming and many operators base their semi-quantitative estimates on visual assessment. Furthermore, test-retest variability for both EF and GLS are significant and may exceed the guideline recommended cut-offs for identification of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity.

The study will compare a simplified echocardiographic protocol focusing on ventricular function with the guideline recommended comprehensive echocardiographic examination using a randomized design. The study will also evaluate if novel tools for improved standardization of recordings and automated measurements of relevant measurements as ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) can improve the diagnostic precision.

Breast cancer patients referred for follow-up at the echocardiography will be included.

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to A) examinations with two- and three-dimensional echocardiography including all central measures of cardiac size and function measured by sonographers as recommended by the European guidelines and as clinical practice or B) echocardiographic examinations focusing on the ventricles.

Subpopulations will undergo additional testing with serial echocardiographic examinations by four operators on the same day with and without use of novel tools for improved standardization of recordings and automated measurements.

Enrollment

250 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Breast cancer and referral for follow-up to identify potential CTRCD

Exclusion criteria

  • Not willing or able to consent

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

250 participants in 2 patient groups

Usual care
Active Comparator group
Description:
Standard of care echocardiographic follow-up
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Comprehensive echocardiographic follow-up
Simplified care
Experimental group
Description:
Simplified echocardiographic follow-up
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Simplified echocardiographic follow-up

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Havard Dalen, MD, PhD; Espen Holte, MD. PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems