ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Tunnel Widening in Augmented ACL Integration Via PrP Enriched Collected Autologous Bone vs Standard ACL Technique

S

Schulthess Klinik

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

Treatments

Procedure: ACL reconstruction (Standard)
Procedure: ACL reconstruction with bone/PrP-composite

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05953051
UE-0073
2022-00168 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this clinical study is to compare the outcomes of two surgical techniques for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after a single, primary ACL rupture.

The main question to be answered is:

  • Does less widening of the tibial tunnel occur when a bone/Platelet rich plasma (PrP) composite material is placed directly into the tibial tunnel after fixation of the implant (experimental group) compared to the same surgery without the use of the composite material (control group)?

Participants will be randomized into one of the two groups and they will not know which group they belong to. After 12 months they will undergo CT, MRI, medical examination and functional knee testing. They will have a further medical examination and functional knee testing at 24 months. Patient Reported Outcomes will be collected before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Full description

To be successful, an ACL reconstruction requires a strong incorporation of the tendon to the bone within or at the margin of the tunnel, but the tunnel itself is at risk of widening, therefore compromising the tendon attachment. A composite of harvested healthy autologous bone fragments from the tunnel and autologous thrombin and fibrin, generated from the patient's PrP could be used at the interface between tunnel and ACL graft at the tibia and femur to reduce frequency of tunnel widening and therefore improve graft-bone-integration.

The study seeks primarily to determine less tibial tunnel widening when a bone/PrP-composite is applied directly in the tibial tunnel compared to the same surgery without using the composite, measured with CT and MRI.

Secondary study objectives are to evaluate femoral tunnel widening, tibial and femoral graft incorporation, graft maturation and knee function (clinical, functional, patient reported) over the course of 24 months follow-up and to evaluate occurrence of procedure- and product-related adverse events and complications.

This is a prospective, single-center, single-blinded, 2-arm-parallel, randomized, controlled study with 24 months follow-up. Participants will be recruited from the Knee Surgery department at Schulthess Klinik when scheduled for ACL reconstruction. The study sample comprises 107 patients, allocated 1:1 on experimental and control arm. Outcome measures are taken at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months. The total study duration is 48 months. The study duration per patient is 24 months.

Enrollment

107 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 50 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-50 years
  • Primary ACL rupture
  • Time from injury to surgery: 4 weeks to 6 months
  • Single ACL rupture (isolated rupture)
  • ACL surgery with one of the participating senior surgeons
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion criteria

  • Concomitant ligamentous instability/rupture
  • Requirement for Meniscus suture (partial resection accepted, hoop and roots remain intact)
  • Requirement for cartilage invasive treatment (debridement accepted)
  • Osteoarthritis at index knee joint
  • Leg axis deviation over 3° valgus or 4° varus
  • Claustrophobia (contra-indication for the MRI)
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding or intention to become pregnant during the study
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability of the patient to follow the study procedures, e.g. language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

107 participants in 2 patient groups

ACLr with bone/PrP-composite
Experimental group
Description:
During surgery, the drilled bone debris is collected in a sterile filtered chamber. Then the bone debris is mixed with PrP. After fixation of the graft the composite is inserted into the drilled tunnel at the interface between tendon to bone. The intraarticular aperture sites are sealed by use of fibrin that is previously gathered out of the PrP as well.
Treatment:
Procedure: ACL reconstruction with bone/PrP-composite
ACLr standard
Active Comparator group
Description:
No insertion of additional material after ACL graft fixation.
Treatment:
Procedure: ACL reconstruction (Standard)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Anika Stephan, MA; Vincent A Stadelmann, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems