Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is a prospective randomized trial to compare twice daily to once daily administration of the basic immunosuppressive regimen in lung transplanted patients.
Full description
Prevalence data of non-compliance in solid organ transplantations fluctuate is reported in up to 39% of transplant recipients (z. B. for lung transplantations 13 - 22%; Kugler et al.). Non-compliance with immunosuppressive therapy is associated with an increased risk of late-acute rejections and the development of chronic transplant dysfunction. Chronic transplant dysfunction (bronchiolitis obliterans- syndrome-BOS) is the second most causing for organ failure after the first year following lung transplantation and often leads to re-transplantation or death. Preventative procedures for improving the compliance are simplification of the dose of the immunosuppressants (a once daily dose instead of a twice daily dose), the prescription of an immunosuppressants with less side-effects and to raise the patient´s awareness for having the greatest responsibility for the efficacy of his therapy. Prospective studies and metaanalysis revealed that the probability for a good compliance can be more than doubled at once daily administration in comparison to twice daily and the best predictor for a good compliance is an easy therapy. For this reason we want to investigate the extent of profit for our lung transplant patients receiving once daily basis immunosuppression in comparison to those who receive twice daily dose.
Hypothesis: Patients of the once daily administration group of the immunosuppressive medication will have a better compliance compared to the twice daily group (as measured by the endpoints variability and medication abstraction from the electronic devices)
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patients (Pts) more than 1 year after single lung, double lung or heart/lung transplantation
Pts treated with cyclosporin, steroids and MMF
Pts ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years and
Pts with one of the following:
pts with recurrent acute rejections (RAR)
two or more acute rejections in 3 months (first 3 years post Tx, 6 months (> 3 years post Tx) defined by:
Pts with steroid-resistant or ongoing acute rejections (OAR) defined by:
Pts with new onset of BOS (nBOS) Unexplained FEV1 < 80% of baseline after exclusion of Infection, airway complication, effusion etc
Pts with CyA associated side effects (e.g., hyperlipidaemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia)
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
25 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal