UHF ECG in LBBB and Response to CRT Prediction (UHF BLOCK)

Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Left Bundle Branch Block; Biventricular Pacing; Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing; Intraventricular Conduction Delay

Treatments: Device: LBBAP CRT device implantation; Device: BVP-CRT

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07057544

UHFBLOCK trial

NW24-02-00143 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The main objective of the project is to demonstrate that in patients with heart failure and QRS complex of nonRBBB morphology lasting over 130 ms, UHF-ECG can differentiate patients with trueLBBB from IVCD better than existing approaches based on the assessment of QRS complex morphology and duration from 12-lead ECG.

Another goal of the proposed study is to demonstrate that trueLBBB patients will benefit more from CRT using left bundle branch pacing than from CRT using biventricular pacing.

The final aim of the project is to demonstrate that the echocardiographic and clinical response in patients with intraventricular conduction disturbance will be dependent on the degree of reduction in ventricular dyssynchrony after CRT.

Full description

Since the introduction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), a way to better define the patients who will benefit from it most has been sought. Their selection based on the duration of the QRS complex or its morphology fails in some of them. Current data demonstrate that CRT done by pacing the conduction system below the site of the left bundle branch block may be a better therapy than biventricular pacing. A prerequisite for a better effect of conduction system pacing is to perform it in patients in whom a conduction block is present in the left bundle branch block ("true" LBBB) and not in the patients with a more distal left ventricular conduction problem (IVCD). The criteria derived from the surface standard ECG are insufficient to differentiate "true" LBBB from IVCD, and thus it is not possible to determine the optimal treatment in some patients. The sequence of ventricular activation can be visualized within a few minutes using ultra-highfrequency ECG (UHF-ECG) in virtually all patients. It is a non-invasive method that shows ventricular dyssynchrony as a time difference between the activation of the ventricles or their individual segments. Pilot data show that patients with "true" LBBB are likely to have greater ventricular dyssynchrony and a different pattern of ventricular depolarization than patients with IVCD. The aim of this project is to test the hypothesis that UHF-ECG can distinguish "true" LBBB from IVCD in patients with heart failure and left ventricular conduction disturbance better than using standard criteria assessing QRS duration and morphology. Other aim is to demonstrate that in patients with trueLBBB resynchronization using conduction system pacing will lead to better echocardiographic and clinical outcomes than biventricular pacing. Finally, the echocardiographic and clinical response of IVCD patients will depend on the reduction of UHF-ECG ventricular dyssynchrony after CRT.

Enrollment: 200 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• HF due to ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
• known coronary angiography
• NYHA II-IV
• LVEF ≤40%
• non-RBBB QRSd lasting >130 ms (by automated measurement)
• proximal LBBB proved by an invasive EP study or non-invasive dyssynchrony assessment in case such a method is confirmed to be non-inferior to an invasive EP study during the project

Exclusion criteria

• Age ˂18 years
• heart failure from reversible causes
• Moderate to severe aortic stenosis
• pregnancy
• active myocarditis
• hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
• cardiac valve surgery in the last three months
• myocardial infarction, PCI, or CABG in the last three months
• severe valvular disease requiring intervention
• severe atherosclerotic disease of the aorta and/or femoral arteries
• life expectancy ˂1 year
• known medical condition or contraindication causing potential complications for EP study

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

200 participants in 2 patient groups

CSP-CRT arm

Experimental group

Description:

In this arm, LBBAP CRT will be performed

Treatment:

Device: LBBAP CRT device implantation

BVP-CRT arm

Active Comparator group

Description:

In this arm, BVP CRT will be performed.

Treatment:

Device: BVP-CRT