ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Ultra-high Density Mapping With Multielectrode Catheter vs Conventional Point by Point Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate Ablation

H

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Ventricular Tachycardia

Treatments

Device: Ablation guided by conventional mapping.
Device: Ablation guided by ultra-high density mapping with multielectrode catheter.

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02083016
PentaRay

Details and patient eligibility

About

Ultra-high density mapping with multielectrode catheter may improve slow conduction channels identification in ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation procedures compared to conventional point by point mapping.

This study compares the ability of both mapping catheters to detect slow conduction channels in areas of myocardial scar and their utility to assess substrate modification after ablation.

Full description

This is a prospective, randomized controlled study. Twenty patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and structurally abnormal ventricle(s) will be prospectively enrolled. In all patients a detailed pre and post-ablation electroanatomical mapping will be performed, and these maps will be merged with CT and/or MRI images. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups. In Group A patients both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter, and secondly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter. In this group, target ablation sites will be guided by point by point map. In Group B patients, both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter, and secondly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter. In this group target ablation sites will be guided by multielectrode contact mapping.

Slow conduction channels will be identified by color-coded voltage map adjustment of the lower and upper thresholds and also the presence of fractioned electrograms with the delayed component showing sequential orthodromic activation. The entrances of these channels will be the target of the ablation sites (scar dechanneling technique).

Enrollment

20 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with indication for ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant woman.
  • Reduced expectancy of life (less than 12 months)
  • Patient participating in another clinical study that investigates a drug or device
  • Psychologically unstable patient or denies to give informed consent
  • Any cause that contraindicate ablation procedure or antiarrhythmic drug

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

20 participants in 2 patient groups

Conventional Mapping
Other group
Description:
Both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter, and secondly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter. In this group, ablation will be guided by conventional mapping.
Treatment:
Device: Ablation guided by conventional mapping.
Multielectrode mapping.
Other group
Description:
Both pre and post-ablation mapping will be performed firstly by multielectrode contact mapping using a Pentaray catheter, and secondly by conventional point by point mapping using a Navistar Thermocool catheter. In this group ablation will be guided by multielectrode contact mapping.
Treatment:
Device: Ablation guided by ultra-high density mapping with multielectrode catheter.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems