Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Persistent occiput posterior position (POPP) represents a relevant risk factor for various adverse outcomes: prolonged labor, higher incidence of operative delivery and/or cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal conditions, higher incidence of high-grade perineal tears (OASIS). For such reasons, labor with POPP needs particular and non-routinary attention.
Hence, it is important to diagnose in advance fetuses who present POPP to assure more adequate assistance in labor. Furthermore, digital examination shows a lower detection rate for such condition if compared to ultrasound in labor.
This multicenter prospective cross-sectional interventional study aims to evaluate the occiput position and the descent of the fetal head at the beginning of active labor to predict POPP at delivery. All the participants will be subjected to transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound at the beginning of active labor (between 3 and 8 cm of cervical dilatation) to evaluate the position of the fetal head and its descent. At the delivery, the position of the fetal head and the features of the second stage of the labor will be recorded.
Full description
Background and rationale Occiput posterior position (OP) is the most common fetal malposition during labor. Such anomaly shows a correlation with higher risk of operative delivery and cesarean section, prolonged labor duration, neonatal morbidity, high-grade perineal lacerations. It is estimated that around 15-30% of fetuses in cephalic presentation start the labor in OP. Of these, 10-15% remain OP at full cervical dilatation, but only 5-8% remains in persistent OP position (POPP) at delivery, especially in nulliparous women.
The importance of knowing the precise position of the fetal head is related to the possible adverse outcome that POPP carries, requiring adequate surveillance during labor and delivery. The non-routinary surveillance consist of:
In case of operative delivery, knowing the exact position of the fetal occiput ensure a better positioning of the vacuum extractor.
Ultrasound in labor ward demonstrated a higher performance compared to routine care (vaginal examination) in diagnosing fetal occiput position. Various approaches have been described to induce fetal head rotation: manual or instrumental intrauterine attempts, or maternal position changes (without any strong evidence).
The mechanism of POPP remains unclear. Predisposing factors are several: nulliparity, android pelvis, obesity, fetal macrosomia, preterm birth7. Some authors suggest that the presence of fibroids, uterine adherences or analgesia in labor could affect the overall risk of malpositions. Relatively to anesthesia, some authors suggest that the prolonged second stage of labor could be the reason for a higher incidence of POPP in women undergoing peridural procedures. Studies evaluating the rotation of the fetal head during labor progression reported discordant results. Some authors suppose that POPP is secondary to an OP at the beginning of the labor, others that anterior or transverse position can be modified by already mentioned risk factors.
In a study conducted on a population of 918 women in labor reported how the main part of OP fetuses at the beginning of labor will rotate to OA at birth, while cases of POPP are related to a persistence of posterior position rather than a malrotation. Eggebo et al reported that the main part of women presenting POPP at birth showed different occiput position at the time of rupture of membranes, reinforcing the theory of malrotation. Another multicentric study, on a population of 100 women, reported no cases of POPP in fetuses with OA at the beginning of labor. Furthermore, evaluating the spine position, the authors say that in case of OP and posterior spine, one case out of seven rotates in OA at birth.
Studies about prediction of POPP show heterogeneity, small populations and in some cases exclusion of participants in case of cesarean section or operative deliveries. Moreover, the grade of descent of the fetal head is a fundamental information not always considered, unlike cervical dilatation, for diagnosis of active labor.
OBJECTIVES
Primary Objective Primary objective of the study is to evaluate POPP in the study population.
Secondary Objectives To develop a predictive model for diagnose POPP at the beginning of active labor.
METHODS Study design Multicenter prospective cross-sectional interventional study without drug nor device Population We will enroll all pregnant women with diagnosis of active labor, admitted to delivery room, afferent to the to the participating centers, satisfying the following inclusion criteria.
Study duration The study will last 12 months. Inclusion criteria
Variables and procedures For each participant, several anamnestic data will be recorded at the enrollment. Each participant, after written consent, once in active labor (defined as cervical dilatation between 4 and 8 cm with presence of regular and painful uterine contractions) will undergo transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound by expert sonographers. Data about fetal occiput position, fetal eyes visualization and fetal head descent (measured by Angle of Progression) will be recorded. Then, at the delivery, we will evaluate the position of the fetal head at birth and the features of the second stage of the labor. All neonatal clinical characteristics will be collected.
At the enrollment, after consent, the following data will be recorded:
Then, all the participants will undergo a transabdominal and transperineal US in lithotomic position to evaluate:
After the birth, following data will be collected:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
• Age ≥18 y.o.;
Exclusion criteria
• Age <18 y.o.;
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
593 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal