Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube

University of Minnesota (UMN)

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Multiple Pulmonary Diseases

Treatments: Device: Endotracheal tube

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06799455

PACCS-2024-33033

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.

Enrollment: 200 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Any patient that is scheduled for EBUS-TBNA procedure

Exclusion criteria

• Those who are not safe to receive moderate sedation or flexible bronchoscopy

Trial design

Primary purpose: Health Services Research

Allocation: N/A

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

200 participants in 2 patient groups

uncuffed endotracheal group

Experimental group

Treatment:

Device: Endotracheal tube

no endotracheal tube group/control

No Intervention group