ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Understanding Evaluation of Patient Information Sheets by User Testing Method

F

Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla

Status

Unknown

Conditions

MS (Multiple Sclerosis)

Treatments

Other: PIS User Testing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03155334
FISM 2012R2

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this randomized, open label, crossover, single site study is to compare the PISs of two Multiple Sclerosis clinical trials to elucidate potential aspects of the given written information that could impact on the smooth running of the studies.

Full description

The participation to a clinical trial is based on two forms of information: the spoken information, usually given by a clinician during the enrolment meeting, and the written information, reported on the Participant Information Sheet (PIS). Numerous studies performed to improve and enhance informed consent, have used different methods to evaluate the quality of the given information such as: interview, checklist, questionnaire, readability formulae. Even if these tools can be useful, they show evident limits in detecting the real efficacy of the proposed consent form in terms of the patient's comprehension.

User Testing (UT) is a method originally developed in the 1990 in Australia, to assess how a text about medicinal products performs with its intended users and not just its content.

Generally, the UT is based on an iterative 4-step process in a cohort of participants (the target group):

  • individual reading of the text;
  • individual questionnaire for a quantitative and qualitative evaluation;
  • a brief semi-structured interview to each participant;
  • a text revision to address any problems identified from participant feedback; Then the revised document is tested again with a second cohort and this iterative process continues until all issues with the document are resolved. However, a methodological issue not yet explored is whether the UT could be used to compare two different PISs, in order to elucidate aspects that could be involved in improving or worsening the understanding of a PIS.

UT has been recently used to evaluate the PIS belonging to phase I and phase III clinical trials (CT) in Myeloid Leukemia, immunomodulatory therapy and for poor responders in vitro fertilization. To date, in no case the UT method has been tested in patients affected by chronic disease like Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

We want to apply the UT approach to highlight the critical issues and communication difficulties present in PISs used in MS clinical trials.

Enrollment

100 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: PwMS (60%) and Caregivers (40%):

for PwMS:

  • 18 years or older;
  • MS diagnosis according to McDonald criteria;
  • Informed consent to the present study for caregivers:
  • 18 years or older;
  • in being a person who takes care of a PwMS;
  • Informed consent to the present study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not having taken part in one of the following trials evaluated in the present study: A) Observational Study of the Prevalence of CCSVI in Multiple Sclerosis and in Other Neurodegenerative Diseases (PIS-A); B) BRAin VEnous DRainage Exploited Against Multiple Sclerosis (PIS-B).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Prevalence of CCSVI in MS
Other group
Description:
Subjects with prevalence of CCSVI in Multiple Sclerosis and in Other Neurodegenerative Diseases - PIS User Testing
Treatment:
Other: PIS User Testing
BVD Exploited Against MS
Other group
Description:
Subjects suffering from Brain venous drainage exploited against Multiple Sclerosis - PIS User Testing
Treatment:
Other: PIS User Testing

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Dionisio Barattini, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems