Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study compare the effectiveness of 2 rehabilitation programmes that use (1) MT with Bilateral TENS (Bi-TENS), (2) sham-MT with Bi-TENS (Bi-TENS), respectively, in addition to conventional rehabilitation of standardized upper limb training, in improving upper limb motor functions, activities of daily living, community integration, and quality of life in patients with stroke.
Full description
The principal aim of the proposed study will be to demonstrate whether MT with Bi-TENS is more effective than sham-MT with Bi-TENS in improving upper limb motor functions, activities of daily living, community integration and quality of life in patients with stroke.
The null hypothesis will be that MT with Bi-TENS is not significantly different from sham-MT with Bi-TENS in improving upper limb motor functions, activities of daily living, community integration, and quality of life in patients with stroke.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
90 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Shamay NG, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal