Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this study is to evaluate if combining activity-based therapy (ABT) with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) can improve recovery of arm and hand movement in people with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). As secondary aims, the study will also investigate at how this combination approach affects the cortical changes in the somatosensory and motor areas of the brain, as well as in the spinal cord and whether it helps participants use their arms more in daily life.
The main questions relevant to this study are:
In this study, participants will:
Researchers will compare the assessment outcomes across the three time points.
Full description
This study is led by Dorothy Barthélemy (Ph.D, pht, Principal Investigator (PI)), Marika Demers (Ph.D, erg., co-PI), Diana Zidarov (Ph.D, co-PI) and Sujata Sinha (PhD, postdoctoral fellow, project lead). Collaborator includes Victoria Duda (PhD).
Population: individuals with SCI with injury level above T2, falling into American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) categories A to D, in the sub-acute phase, and of minimum age of 16 years. These participants are in-patients admitted in the Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal, Canada.
Participants will be randomized (1:1 ratio) into two equal groups, ABT + tSCS and ABT + sham stimulation and stratified based on ASIA level, age and sex.
During the training session, the ABT + tSCS group will receive ABT combined with tSCS. The tSCS will be delivered using surface electrode placed between C4 and T1 as a cathode and self-adhesive surface electrodes placed in the clavicular region on both sides as anodes. tSCS will deliver tonic pulses (30 - 100 Hz) and at an intensity that facilitates voluntary movements (usually 15 mA and up), determined prior to the first training session. Each ABT session will include 5 parts:
In the ABT+ sham stimulation group, intensity will be set at sensory threshold that will not facilitate any movement (usually 2-3mA). The ABT will be similar to the other group.
Prior to the training, clinical tests will be conducted to assess assess their muscle strength, sensations, and the quality of movements participants can make with their arms. Specifically, the primary measure will consist of the Upper Extremity Motor Score from the with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Exam. The secondary clinical measures will include the following assessments: the Grasp and Release Test, Monofilaments test, Sensory function of the upper limb dermatomes from C4 to T1, Grip and pinch strength with a dynamometer, Proprioception subtest of the Fugl Meyer Assessment, Tetraplegic Upper Limb Activity Questionnaire (TUAQ) and Finger-to-Nose Test from the Comprehensive Coordination Scale. More details of the measures are in the Outcome Measures section.
For neurophysiological measures, electrophysiological assessments will include transspinal evoked potential (TEP), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) using electroencephalogram (EEG).
These assessments will be conducted before the training, immediately after the training and one month later.
As for the experiment, 40 participants will be recruited, as determined by a priori power analysis.
For the neuroplasticity evaluation, TEP, TMS and EEG will be used.
2. To assess changes in brain mechanisms, particularly those related to sensory function, EEG recordings will be performed using Brain Vision's 32-electrode cap, with the Fz electrode used as the reference. Recordings will be obtained using a Brain Vision 32-channel EEG cap referenced to Fz. The median nerve of the upper limb will be electrically stimulated to elicit cortical responses. The entire evaluation duration will be for 90 minutes including the setup.
EEG activity from C3 and C4 corresponding to the contralateral sensorimotor cortex, will be analyzed, focusing on the N20 and P25 somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components, which occur approximately 20 ms and 25 ms post-stimulus, respectively. The N20-P25 complex reflects transmission through ascending somatosensory pathways.
N20 refers to the SSEP peaking approximately 20 ms after the onset of electrical stimulation at the ulnar nerve. P25 follows the N20, peaking around 25 ms after stimulus onset. Together, these form the N20-P25 complex, which reflects the transmission along ascending neuronal pathways. The amplitude and latency of the SSEPs will be compared across the 3 time frames in each group. In addition to C3 and C4, the neighboring electrode regions will also be inspected to identify any additional SSEPs that may emerge. More details of the measurement are in the Outcome Measures section.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
40 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Dorothy Barthelemy, pht., Ph.D; Marika Demers, erg., Ph.D
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal