ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Ureteral Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Vanderbilt University Medical Center logo

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Status

Completed

Conditions

Kidney Calculi

Treatments

Procedure: Ureteroscopy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03855787
URSSTONE

Details and patient eligibility

About

The rationale for this study is to determine if there is a difference in complications among patients undergoing ureteroscopy for renal stones who receive a stent compared to not receiving a stent postoperatively.

Full description

Kidney stones affect 9% individuals within the United States, and the prevalence is increasing. Over the last few decades, ureteroscopy has become the most commonly performed stone procedure. However the complication rate after ureteroscopy is not insignificant. Reducing morbidity after ureteroscopy would improve patient outcomes and reduce health care utilization.

A major contributor to patient morbidity after ureteroscopy is the ureteral stent, which is placed at the time of surgery and left in place 1-2 weeks after surgery. The rationale for utilizing stents is to prevent urinary obstruction from edema or stone fragments. On the other hand, stents cause hematuria, pain, and lower urinary tract symptoms. Additionally, stent-related symptoms are often misdiagnosed as urinary tract infections leading to unnecessary antibiotic use.

The clinical utility of ureteral stents after ureteroscopy has not been well studied, specifically a stone located in the kidney. Prior studies on stent-less ureteroscopic procedures have focused on treatment of ureteral stones and not stones located in the kidney, have had restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria, are primarily from single center institutions, and most being performed ~15 years ago. Surgical techniques and device innovations have changed the procedure since that time. To date, there have been only 2 studies that included stone located in the kidney showing no difference in unplanned hospital revisits, however both combined analyses with ureteral stones and selection bias was an issue for both studies. In addition, there is a lack of studies assessing opiate use, impact of quality of life with stent placement, and loss of work related to stent placement

Enrollment

103 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • nonobstructing renal stone 1.5cm total stone diameter (if multiple stones, then sum of maximum diameters) or less undergoing ureteroscopy

Exclusion criteria

  • age < 18 years
  • pregnancy status
  • ureteral stone
  • preoperative hydronephrosis
  • indwelling nephrostomy tube
  • planning bilateral ureteroscopy or subsequent staged ureteroscopy
  • solitary kidney or eGFR <60 mL/min (CKD stage 3 or greater)
  • variant anatomy including horseshoe kidney, pelvic kidney, prior urinary tract reconstruction

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

103 participants in 2 patient groups

Ureteral stent group
Active Comparator group
Description:
A ureteral stent will be placed after ureteroscopy.
Treatment:
Procedure: Ureteroscopy
No ureteral stent group
Active Comparator group
Description:
A ureteral stent will not be placed after ureteroscopy.
Treatment:
Procedure: Ureteroscopy

Trial contacts and locations

7

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ryan Hsi, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems