USCOM For Assessing Patients With COPD

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Treatments: Device: Spirometry; Device: Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02329522

2013.640

Details and patient eligibility

About

Objective

The Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) is a non-invasive, quantitative method for measuring and monitoring cardiovascular haemodynamic parameters in patients. The aims of this study are:

1. To investigate whether there is any correlation between haemodynamic parameters and COPD severity.
2. To investigate whether USCOM-derived haemodynamic variables may be used as prognostic indicators of 6-month, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year readmission.
3. To investigate whether USCOM-derived haemodynamic variables may be used as prognostic indicators of 6-month, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year all-cause mortality.

Design, Setting and Subjects This prospective observational study will be conducted in the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong.

Interventions Haemodynamic measurements made using the USCOM, and spirometry, will be performed as appropriate on subjects in respiratory clinic, the emergency department, medical wards and on ICU. In order to assess inter-observer variability, a second, blinded operator will repeated 15% of scans.

Full description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of death in the world, a lung disorder which is characterized by a partially reversible airflow limitation, which is usually progressive, and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response to noxious particles or gases. In 2005, among elderly Hong Kong Chinese (age ≥60 years) in Hong Kong with COPD defined as an FEV1/FVC <70%, 19.6% males and 11.9% females suffered from moderate levels of severity.

From an initial stable condition, an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is characterized by a sudden onset of breathlessness, purulent sputum, and increases in sputum volume. Other symptoms include increasing cough, wheeze, chest tightness or fatigue. The major cause of AECOPD is infection, although other stimulating factors include air pollution, withdrawal of medication, and low temperature. After the first admission of an exacerbation, the readmission rate for patients with AECOPD is high. The mean number of annual readmissions is 2.2 episodes, with a one-year mortality rate of 14%.

Spirometry can help to diagnose COPD patients, and a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7 confirms the presence of airflow limitation. The classification of severity of airflow limitation in COPD is based on GOLD category. The lower the post-bronchodilator FEV1, the higher is the severity. This method is useful for assessing patients with stable COPD only. For those with AECOPD, this method may not be easy to conduct and assess patients immediately due to patients' difficulty in breathing.

A common dilemma facing clinicians is whether patients presenting with breathlessness, cough and wheeze have an acute exacerbation of COPD, an acute exacerbation of left ventricular failure (LVF), or some degree of both. Making an accurate diagnosis is important as the treatment in each case is different, and a quick recovery depends upon appropriate and timely intervention and treatment.

Unlike acute exacerbations of asthma, there are no objective guidelines on how to assess the severity and prognosis of patients presenting to hospital with acute exacerbations of COPD. However, the CURB65, originally intended for assessing patients with pneumonia, has been evaluated in this context. High CURB65 scores in patients presenting with acute exacerbations of COPD do predict increasing risk of hospital and one month mortality from 2 to 21% but do not predict patients with very high risk.

In healthy subjects, the presence or absence of carbon dioxide retention influences the body's haemodynamic response. Hypercapnia has been shown to increase mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and mean arterial BP (MAP). However, hypercapnia does not appear to affect indices of systolic function, such as peak aortic velocity and aortic mean and peak acceleration, or plasma renin, angiotensin II, and aldosterone activity.

In stable patients with compensated COPD, elevations in CO2 trigger central and peripheral chemoreceptors resulting in an increased depth and rate of respiration, bradycardia (via vagal stimulation), and systemic vasoconstriction (via sympathetic stimulation). Therefore, cardiovascular parameters may be either normal or, if there is a degree of carbon dioxide retention resulting in catecholamine release and autonomic stimulation, then moderately hyperdynamic. Patients with COPD should have a cardiac Index (CI), which is elevated either towards the upper half or above the normal range, and may be as high as 5L/min/m2, an elevated SI, an elevated SVR and elevated DO2.

The Smith-Madigan Index II (SMII) is a novel measure of inotropy, which in stable COPD patients should either be normal or, if there are adrenergic effects, then may be elevated to as much as 1.6. The effects of hypercapnia in patients with COPD on potential to kinetic energy ratio (PE/KE, PKR), flow time (FT), peak velocity (Vpk) and mean pressure gradient (Pmn) are unknown.

These changes contrast with patients with acute LVF, where CI is low and the SMII is usually less than 1.0, and commonly around 0.7 - 0.8. PE/KE and SVR are generally much higher, and FT (as a function of SV) is longer. Vpk and Pmn are also lower in LVF.

We have conducted a preliminary study to evaluate the correlation between severity of COPD and haemodynamic parameters. 86 stable COPD patients, 43 AECOPD patients and 36 healthy, age and gender matched subjects were recruited. It was found that the severity of COPD correlated positively with mean heart rate, cardiac index (CI), ejection time percentage (ET%) oxygen delivery index (DO2I) and inotropy. When compared with healthy controls, stable GOLD IV patients had a significantly higher CI (3.98 vs 3.15 l/min/m2, p<0.005), inotropy (2.14 vs 1.72 W/m2, p<0.01) and DO2I (679.8 vs 530.7 ml/min/m2, p<0.01), and a significantly lower potential to kinetic energy ratio (PKR) (43.0 vs 56.6, p<0.05). Moreover, the 30-day readmission rate was the highest in GOPD IV patients. Based on the existing findings, it would be interesting to study the long-term prognostic effect of haemodynamic parameters in COPD patients.

Aim

The aims of the present study for patients visited respiratory clinic or admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), including those admitted to resuscitation room or emergency high dependency unit, are:

1. To investigate whether there is any correlation between haemodynamic parameters and COPD severity.
2. To investigate whether USCOM-derived haemodynamic variables may be used as prognostic indicators of 6-month, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year readmission.
3. To investigate whether USCOM-derived haemodynamic variables may be used as prognostic indicators of 6-month, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year all-cause mortality.

Measurements

• Haemodynamic measurements using an Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM®; USCOM Pty Ltd, NSW, Australia)
• Lung function assessment using Spirometry (MICROLAB 3300 spirometer; Micro Medical, Kent, UK)
• 6-minute walk test
• Borg dyspnoea scale
• Blood pressure
• End-tidal CO2

Definition of haemodynamic parameters:

• Velocity time integral (vti) is the integral of the flow profile, i.e. the distance the blood travels in one beat. The unit of vti is m/s.
• Cardiac output (CO) is the volume of blood pumped by the heart in one minute: CO = SV x HR. The unit is l/min.
• Cardiac index (CI) is equal to CO divided by BSA. The unit is l/min/m2.
• Stroke volume (SV) is the volume of blood ejected from the heart during one systolic stroke. SV = vti x πr2,where πr2 = flow cross sectional area. The unit of SV is ml.
• Stroke volume index (SVI) is SV divided by BSA and the unit is ml/m2.
• Stroke volume variation (SVV) is the percentage change in SV between a group of beats. SVV = (SVmax - SVmin x 100) / [(SVmax + SVmin)/2].
• Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) is the pressure against which the heart pumps. SVR = MAP/CO. The unit is d.s.cm-5.
• Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) SVRI = SVR x BSA d.s.cm-5m2.
• Oxygen delivery (DO2) is calculated by the equation: DO2 = 1.34 x Hb x SpO2/100 x CO, where Hb = hemoglobin in grams of hemoglobin per litre of blood (g/l); SpO2 = the peripheral oxygen saturation as a percentage (%). The unit of DO2 is ml/min.
• Oxygen delivery index (DO2I) is equal to DO2 divided by BSA. The unit of DO2I is ml/min/m2.
• Inotropy index refers to (Potential energy + Kinetic energy) divided by body surface area. The unit of inotropy is W/m2.
• Potential to kinetic energy ratio (PKR) is the energy used to produce blood pressure divided by the energy used to produce blood flow.

Enrollment: 200 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 40+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age >40 years;
• Clinically diagnosed as COPD by physicians;
• Obtain any one of exacerbating symptoms (increased dyspnoea, sputum production, sputum volume, wheeze, cough or exertional dyspnoea);

Exclusion criteria

• Known or suspected pregnancy, lactating patients, active malignancies, severe mobility problems (e.g. significant painful arthritis), and confusion or dementia .

Trial design

200 participants in 4 patient groups

Stable COPD patients

Description:

Patients will be assessed using USCOM and spirometry. For those with FEV1 to FVC ratio smaller than 70%, they will be classified as COPD.

Treatment:

Device: Spirometry

Device: Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor

AECOPD patients

Description:

Patients will be assessed using USCOM and spirometry. Spirometry will be assessed after 2 to 4 weeks post-hospital discharge.

Treatment:

Device: Spirometry

Device: Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor

Patient Controls

Description:

Patients will be assessed using USCOM and spirometry. For those with COPD symptoms but FEV1 to FVC ratio greater than 70%, they will be classified as non-COPD.

Treatment:

Device: Spirometry

Device: Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor

Healthy Controls

Description:

Healthy subjects, with no history of COPD or other significant chronic illness will be recruited as healthy controls. Subjects will be matched for age and gender with the patient groups. They will be assessed using USCOM.

Treatment:

Device: Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor