Use of Implanting the Biotronik Passeo-18 Lux Drug Coated Balloon to Treat Failing Haemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts. (SEMPER FI)

Singapore Health Services (SingHealth)

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Dialysis Access Malfunction; Arterio-venous Fistula; Hemodialysis Access Failure; Arteriovenous Graft Stenosis

Treatments: Device: Passeo-18 Lux

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04381754

1.5

Details and patient eligibility

About

The most common problem with haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and arterio-venous grafts (AVG) is stenosis, which can lead to inadequate dialysis, and eventual access thrombosis. Conventional plain old balloon angioplasty is associate with high recurrence rates of stenosis and repeated interventions. The advent of successful drug-eluting technology in the treatment of the coronary vascular bed and subsequent positive accumulating evidence in the peripheral arterial circulation has prompted the use of drug coated balloons (DCB) in the access fistula circuit for venous stenosis and in-stent restenosis. Recent studies suggest that DCBs may significantly reduce re-intervention rates on native and recurrent lesions. The restenosis process is in part or in whole the result of neo-intimal hyperplasia (NIH) and NIH is considered the main culprit in access circuit target lesion stenosis. NIH is the blood vessel's healing response to the barotrauma from the angioplasty process. A critical component of NIH is the cellular proliferative stage with mononuclear leucocytes identified as the primary inflammatory cell type involved. The rationale for drug elution is to block the NIH response with an anti-metabolite such as paclitaxel. It is important to emphasize that the role of drug elution in the treatment of vascular stenosis is not to obtain a good haemodynamic and luminal result but to preserve a good result obtained during POBA from later restenosis due to NIH and minimise reinterventions and readmissions to hospital for what is a frail population of patients.

A meta-analysis performed by Khawaja et al. seemed to suggest that DCBs conferred some benefit in terms of improving target lesion primary patency (TLPP) in AVFs. An updated meta-analysis performed by our own institution recently showed that DCB appears to be a better and safe alternative to conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA) in treating patients with HD stenosis based on 6- and 12-months primary patency and increased intervention free period.

The Passeo-18 Lux (Biotronik Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Singapore)) drug-coated balloon (DCB) is packaged with a low dose of paclitaxel. Recent studies have shown that low dose coating of paclitaxel with this DCB is useful for preventing restenosis, decrease lumen loss and target lesion revascularization in the peripheral vasculature6 but has not been tested in the dialysis access circuit.

Enrollment: 100 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 21 to 90 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patient aged ≥21 years and ≤90 years

• Native AVF was created more than 2 months prior to the index procedure and had undergone 10 or more hemodialysis sessions utilizing 2 needles

• Target lesion location had to be located between the anastomosis to the axillary-subclavian vein junction, as defined by insertion of the cephalic vein.

• On initial fistulogram, target lesion stenosis had to be >50% on angiographic assessment and in keeping with the clinical indicator for intervention

• Stenosis had to be < 10cm in length to allow for potential treatment with one PCB (length 12 cm) only

• Stenosis had to be initially treated successfully with a high-pressure plain balloon prior to PCB treatment as defined by:

  1. No clinically significant dissection
  2. No extravasation requiring treatment/stenting
  3. Residual stenosis ≤20% by angiographic measurement
  4. Ability to completely efface the lesion waist using the pre-dilation balloon

• No more than one additional ("nontarget") lesions in the access circuit that had to be also successfully treated (≤30% residual stenosis) before drug elution. Separate lesion was defined by at least 3 cm in distance from the target lesion.

• Reference vessel diameter 4mm - 8mm

Exclusion criteria

• Women who were pregnant, lactating, or planning on becoming pregnant during the study
• Subject had more than two lesions in the access circuit
• Subject had a secondary non-target lesion that could not be successfully treated
• Sepsis or active infection
• Asymptomatic target lesions
• A thrombosed access or an access with thrombosis treated ≤30 days prior to the index procedure
• Surgical revision of the access site performed, planned or expected ≤ 3 months before or after the index procedure
• Patients who were taking immunosuppressive therapy or are routinely taking ≥ 15 mg of prednisone per day;
• Currently participating in an another investigational drug, biologic, or device study involving sirolimus or paclitaxel
• Contraindication to aspirin or clopidogrel usage
• Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, or language barrier such that the subject is unable to give informed consent
• Uncooperative attitude or potential for non-compliance with the requirements of the protocol making study participation impractical
• Where final angioplasty treatment requires a stent or drug eluting balloon > 8mm in diameter
• Metastatic cancer or terminal medical condition
• Blood coagulation disorders
• Limited life expectancy (< 12 months)
• Allergy or other known contraindication to iodinated media contrast, heparin or paclitaxel

Trial design

100 participants in 1 patient group

AVG/AVF Treated with Passeo-18 Lux

Description:

Patients with failing dialysis access, treated lesions located between the anastomosis to the axillary-subclavian vein junction.

Treatment:

Device: Passeo-18 Lux