Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of a new HMF and those of other HMF used before in very preterm infants.
Full description
Infants with fortified human milk feeding have the same rate of growth, lower incidence of nosocomial infections and feeding intolerance compared to those with formula feeding during hospitalization. However, the currently human milk fortifiers (HMF) have some nutritional components defects to meet the needs of very preterm infants. New HMF provide higher protein and fat, which are safe and well tolerate to use in preterm infants. Study on safety and efficacy of the new HMF is insufficient in Chinese preterm infant population. Our aims are to compare the safety and efficacy of a new HMF and other HMF used before in very preterm infants. Very low preterm infants with birth weights of 1000-1499g and gestational age 28+0 weeks to 31 + 6 weeks are included. Infants feeding with new HMF are in the experimental group. Infants feeding with other HMF are in the control group, a historically control group. Physical growth, nutritional indexes, incidence of feeding intolerance, and time to achieve full enteral feeding are compared between the two groups.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
276 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal