ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Uterine Manipulation During Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer (MAN-U)

A

Anthony Costales, MD

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

Treatments

Device: Surgery with UM
Device: Surgery without UM

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04586959
H-46373

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized non-inferiority phase III study to evaluate if patients undergoing a minimally invasive surgery for early stage uterine cancer have cancer cells in the fluid that is obtained at the time of their surgery when a uterine manipulator is placed versus patients who do not have a uterine manipulator placed.

Full description

In most cases, patients who have early stage endometrial cancer undergo a surgery to remove the uterus, cervix, tubes, ovaries, and occasionally lymph nodes. This is usually done through a minimally invasive (not a large incision) surgery. To accomplish this, the uterus needs to be manipulated (moved around) to help the surgeon complete your surgery. This is usually done with a device called a uterine manipulator and the majority of surgeons use this device in any patient undergoing a minimally invasive hysterectomy (removal of the uterus and cervix).

Even though the majority of surgeons use a manipulator, there are some surgeons who believe there is a possibility that cancer cells inside the uterus can be spilled into the abdomen through the fallopian tubes. This may cause a higher risk of spreading the cancer and or of the cancer coming back.

Currently, there are very limited research studies directly looking at whether the uterine manipulator may cause these cells to appear in the abdomen.

The purpose of this study is to see if patients undergoing a minimally invasive surgery for early stage uterine cancer have cancer cells in the fluid that is obtained at the time of their surgery when a uterine manipulator is placed versus patients who do not have a uterine manipulator placed.

A computer program will randomly assign the subjects to one of two groups. One group will have minimally invasive surgery with the use of a uterine manipulator and the other group will have minimally invasive surgery without the use of a uterine manipulator.

Researchers will use the information from this study to decide how best to take care of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for uterine cancer.

Enrollment

278 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

A subject will be considered eligible for inclusion in this study if all the following criteria are met:

  1. Patient must be greater than or equal to 18 years old.
  2. Suspected clinically early stage endometrial cancer of any histology (endometrioid, mixed, serous, clear-cell, carcinosarcomas, mucinous)
  3. Pre-operative imaging not suggestive of extra-uterine disease, if obtained pre-operatively.
  4. CA 125 testing is optional but, if obtained, must be within lab normal values. 5. ECOG performance status 0-2 (see appendix 1).

6. Signed informed consent and ability to comply with follow-up. 7. Per the opinion of the treating investigator, the patient must be a suitable candidate for the MIS surgical procedure.

Exclusion criteria

A subject must not have any of the following criteria:

  1. Planned laparotomic hysterectomy
  2. On progesterone therapy to treat their endometrial cancer
  3. Any prior pelvic irradiation

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

278 participants in 2 patient groups

Surgery With UM (Arm MAN UA)
Experimental group
Description:
Subjects that undergo a MIS approach with a uterine manipulator (experimental arm)
Treatment:
Device: Surgery with UM
Surgery Without UM (Arm Control)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Subjects that undergo a MIS approach without a uterine manipulator (control arm)
Treatment:
Device: Surgery without UM

Trial contacts and locations

5

Loading...

Central trial contact

Roberto Vargas, MD; Anthony Costales, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems