ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Uterine Manipulator Versus No Uterine Manipulator in Endometrial Cancer Trial (MANEC)

U

University of Verona

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Endometrial Neoplasms

Treatments

Device: Uterine manipulator use

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05687084
MANEC Trial

Details and patient eligibility

About

Minimally invasive surgery is the recommended approach in endometrial cancer (EC) patients based on the results of two randomized controlled trials, given its advantages without compromised oncologic outcomes. The uterine manipulator is commonly used in benign and malignant pathologies to perform a laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. However, although regularly used, the uterine manipulator adoption in EC is a controversial technical aspect due to the raised concerns regarding the possible risk of disruption of the tumor mass, the spread of malignant cells, and seeding of the disease, particularly at the level of the vaginal cuff or spread of tumor cells, with increased risk of recurrence and death due to EC. On that basis, given that hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator is feasible, only a randomized controlled trial comparing oncologic outcomes in EC patients after use versus not use of the uterine manipulator will be able to provide high-quality evidence to answer this critical question and allow or exclude the use of a uterine manipulator during minimally invasive hysterectomy for EC.

Enrollment

1,030 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 100 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer of any histology (including carcinosarcoma) and grade
  • Planned surgical treatment including hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (ovarian preservation in selected patients is not an exclusion criterion)
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • No preoperative evidence of extrauterine disease (Clinical stage IIIA, IIIB)
  • No preoperative evidence of suspicious lymph nodes (Clinical stage IIIC)
  • No preoperative evidence of distant metastasis (Clinical stage IV)
  • Approved and signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Synchronous or previous (< 5 years) invasive cancer, not including non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Fertility preservation
  • World Health Organization performance score > 2
  • Uterine sarcoma
  • Previous pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy, hormone therapy for cancer (< 5 years), chemotherapy (< 5 years), pelvic or paraaortic lymphadenectomy, or retroperitoneal surgery
  • Inadequate bone marrow function (white blood cells <3·0×109/L, platelets <100×109/L)
  • Inadequate liver function (bilirubin >1.5×upper normal limit [UNL], aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase >2.5 × UNL)
  • Inadequate kidney function (creatinine clearance < 60 mL per min calculated according to Cockcroft-Gault 10 or < 50 mL per min Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance)
  • Intraoperative evidence of stage IV disease

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

1,030 participants in 2 patient groups

Total hysterectomy with a uterine manipulator
Experimental group
Description:
Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed with the use of a uterine manipulator during surgery.
Treatment:
Device: Uterine manipulator use
Total hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator
No Intervention group
Description:
Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed without the use of a uterine manipulator during surgery.

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Central trial contact

Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD; Simone Garzon, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems