Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this randomized trial is to learn if educational materials and personalized prescribing Portraits change the frequency of ordering HbA1c tests by clinicians in British Columbia, Canada.
The main research question: To investigate the overall utilization patterns of HbA1c testing and evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized prescribing Portrait and educational materials to reduce over-utilization of HbA1c tests in diabetes management.
Participants are nurse practitioners and family physicians actively practicing in British Columbia. Participants are registered for the online prescribing Portrait program on the Therapeutics Initiative website where they can access their digital prescribing Portraits. Participants were randomized to receive educational materials on the topic of HbA1c testing either in an Early Group (Group 1 or Arm A) or in a Delayed Group (Group 2 or Arm B). Using administrative health data, the ordering of HbA1c tests by those in the Early Group will be compared with those in the Delayed Group to see if the materials influence the frequency of ordering HbA1c tests. Group 3 (Arm C) will be a control group for Groups 1 and 2 and include participants who receive no intervention.
Full description
Diabetes is a major health issue in Canada; about 30% of Canadians are diagnosed with diabetes or prediabetes, with an estimated healthcare system cost of $18.25 billion in 2024.
The glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) test is widely used for screening and monitoring diabetes and prediabetes. Canadian guidelines recommend a minimum of 3-month interval for re-testing in diabetes, and 6 months for patients who have reached stable glycemic control. HbA1c test reflects best the blood glucose level in the last 60 to 90 days. Testing too frequently creates unnecessary healthcare costs and burdens for patients and healthcare providers. Testing too infrequently is associated with inadequate glycemic control, and can lead to undiagnosed diabetes and diabetes complications.
Audit and feedback is an approach where individual prescribers receive feedback on their own prescribing or ordering of tests with the aim of improving their prescribing or ordering decisions. The Therapeutics Initiative research group does regular work in this area through the prescribing Portrait program, which aims to improve prescribing by providing audit and feedback and education to prescribers in British Columbia, Canada.
This study is a randomized trial testing the effectiveness of personalized prescribing Portraits and Therapeutics Letters to reduce the over utilization of HbA1c testing for patients with diabetes in the primary care setting in British Columbia. Patients with diabetes will be categorized in 3 groups: 1) diabetes; 2) pre-diabetes; 3) non-diabetic.
7776 active BC clinicians (family physicians and nurse practitioners) were randomly divided into 2 groups (n =3,888 in each group). At the time the Portraits were generated there were 968 people registered for the Portrait program and eligible to access this prescribing Portrait through the secure website (Group 1, n = 484; Group 2, n = 484). A third group of participants who are not registered with the Portrait program and will not have access to the intervention will be compared with Groups 1 and 2 in 2027.
On March 31, 2025 clinicians in Group 1 were notified by email that their prescribing Portraits and Therapeutics Letter were available for viewing in their Portrait accounts. Twelve months later, in March 2026, clinicians in Group 2 will receive this same notification and access to the same materials. The analysis will assess whether the materials led Group 1 clinicians to change how they order HbA1c tests for patients with diabetes.
The analysis will identify:
Analysis will be conducted using secondary data from administrative databases from the BC Ministry of Health (under an Information Sharing Agreement). The data are patient level and include anonymized information about demographics, health costs, physician billing codes, prescriptions, outpatient records, and hospitalizations. The data do not include personally identifiable patient information.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Physicians and nurse practitioners:
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
968 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal