ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Validation of the Cervicothoracic Differentiation Test (EMU)

University of Hartford logo

University of Hartford

Status

Completed

Conditions

Neck Pain

Treatments

Other: spinal manipulation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06287242
24-01-282

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of two spinal manipulations in adults between the ages of 18-65 based on the results of a non-invasive clinical test. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does matched or unmatched region of manipulation based on the CTDT result in greater reduction of pain levels and improvement in range of motion in adults with neck pain compared to unmatched manipulations? Participants will be asked to:

  • rate their pain with neck movement, complete brief questionnaires about their pain,
  • have their neck range of motion measured,
  • perform a test known as the cervico-thoracic differentiation test (CTDT),
  • receive either a cervical or thoracic manipulation,
  • repeat the range of motion measurements.
  • A second session will occur 7-10 days later where questionnaires and range of motion measures will be repeated.

Researchers will compare the effects of manipulation matched to CTDT test result to individuals in the unmatched CTDT manipulation group to see if the CTDT may indicate which region will provide a greater treatment effect for individuals with neck pain.

Enrollment

40 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • between the ages of 18 and 65,
  • must report neck pain with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) greater than or equal to 3/10.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of motor vehicle accident (MVA) within the past 6 months,
  • hypertension greater than or equal to 160/100,
  • non-mechanical neck pain (pain that is not reproducible with movement),
  • any past or present history of cancer,
  • upper motor neuron (CNS) lesion symptoms ( a positive Clonus sign, Babinski sign, or hyperreflexia of DTR's),
  • any infection that originates from the spine
  • Current confirmed or suspected pregnancy, or recent postpartum (6 mos),
  • known osteoporosis,
  • rheumatoid arthritis,
  • long-term use of corticosteroids (>6mos),
  • history of neck surgery,
  • history of vertebral or rib fractures,
  • blood clotting disorders,
  • connective tissue disorders,
  • radicular/neural pain/symptoms. Radicular pain and symptoms would include dermatomal changes (sensory loss or hypersensitization), myotomal changes (weaknesses of muscular along nerve distributions), decreased reflexes (hyporeflexia), pain that travels down the upper extremities, and pain that is referred into the upper extremities.
  • clinical signs of instability of the vertebral segments in their neck

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

40 participants in 2 patient groups

matched manipulation
Active Comparator group
Description:
For the matched manipulation group, participants with the source of neck pain at the cervical spine determined by the CTDT will receive a cervical manipulation, and participants with the source of neck pain at the thoracic spine determined by the CTDT will receive a thoracic manipulation. The manipulation will be given to the participant's most provocative spinal level as determined by the examiner and side determined by the CTDT. The investigator will be limited to 2 manipulation attempts even if cavitation was not achieved.
Treatment:
Other: spinal manipulation
unmatched manipulation
Active Comparator group
Description:
For the unmatched manipulation group, participants with the source of neck pain at the cervical spine determined by the CTDT will receive a thoracic manipulation, and participants with the source of neck pain at the thoracic spine found during the CTDT will receive a cervical manipulation. The manipulation will be given to the most hypomobile spinal level determined by the physical therapist and to the most provocative side found during the CTDT. The investigator will be limited to 2 manipulation attempts even if cavitation was not achieved.
Treatment:
Other: spinal manipulation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Brian Swanson, PT, DSc

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems