Status
Conditions
About
Research problem: In 1991, the terms Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), severe sepsis, and septic shock were introduced, based on the pro-inflammatory theory, conforming to a list of classification criteria for each one. New criteria were recently created in search of coherence with the pathophysiological process that generates the infection in the host: SOFA and qSOFA scores. Neither of these two criteria has been standardized in the obstetric patient, taking into account the physiological alteration of many of the clinical and laboratory parameters that occur in pregnancy. The question that arises then is: Are the new sepsis criteria qSOFA and SOFA valid in comparison with the previous SIRS criteria for predicting adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in obstetric patients diagnosed with infection? Aim: To evaluate the predictive model quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in comparison with the SIRS criteria for the prognosis of severe infection-sepsis in obstetric patients and adverse neonatal outcomes in different cities of Colombia.
Methodology: a longitudinal prospective cohort multicenter study will be carried out in selected centers in Colombia, with a data collection duration of at least 12 months. Data will be collected on clinical characteristics, health outcomes, and medical practices. Study participants will be followed during their stay at the health center. Follow-up will end at hospital discharge, transfer to a facility outside of participating geographic areas, or death. Neonates born to mothers included in the study will be followed until discharge from the hospital or 7 days after birth if they are still in the hospital, whichever comes first.
Expected results: This study seeks to evaluate the predictive model q SOFA and the prognosis of sepsis in obstetrics in comparison with the SIRS criteria, hoping to find that qSOFA is superior to the SIRS criteria for the identification of which obstetric patients diagnosed with an infection they will progress to sepsis and which patients with sepsis progress to septic shock, this would translate both at the maternal and neonatal level in a reduction of adverse events, prolonged stays, disabilities, sequelae, in addition to allowing preventive actions and control, which finally translate into protocols that allow better management of this entity.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Note: observations on the inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Pregnant women of any age who do not sign the informed consent.
Pregnant minors who do not sign the consent.
Any non-serious or localized infection
Any chronic uncomplicated infection
Any colonization Microorganisms without clinical signs / symptoms)
Patients with surgical wound infection other than caesarean section (hysterectomy, laparotomy or others)
Any iatrogenic / hyperthermic hypothermia (eg related to epidural, thyroid storm, prostaglandin administration) during hospital stay.
Use of any prescription of prophylactic antibiotics (eg, for colonization of beta-hemolytic streptococcus group B, after cesarean section, manual removal of the placenta, vaginal delivery);
Patients referred from other institutions with more than 24 hours of management
2,125 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal