Validity and Reliability of Ultrasound Imaging for Measuring Coronal and Sagittal Angles in Idiopathic Scoliosis

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Validation Studies as Topic; Program Evaluation; Coronal; Idiopathic Scoliosis; Sagittal; Ultrasonography

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06510049

2024-KS-467-01

Details and patient eligibility

About

Patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS), especially children and adolescents, require regular follow-up evaluations. Ultrasound imaging offers a reliable, radiation-free method for assessing spinal curvatures in the coronal and sagittal planes. While manual labeling in traditional ultrasound is error-prone, automated labeling reduces inaccuracies but still needs further validation, particularly in the sagittal plane. This study compared three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound assessments with conventional X-ray images--the clinical gold standard. And it is aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of ultrasound measurements-Ultrasound Curve Angle (UCA) and Ultrasound Lamellar Angle (USLA)-against established radiographic benchmarks like Cobb's angle, Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), and Lumbar Lordosis (LL).

Full description

This study was structured into two fundamental segments: 1) a dual-operator analysis focused on evaluating both intra- and inter-operator reliability of the UCA and USLA; and 2) a validation study of radiographic indices, specifically the coronal Cobb angle, TK, and LL, in correlation with UCA and USLA measurements. Initially, 100 patients diagnosed with IS were subjected to both standard radiographic and 3D ultrasound examinations. Owing to various exclusion criteria, 20 patients were subsequently disqualified from the study, resulting in a final sample of 80 patients for statistical evaluation. Reliability assessments were conducted using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, the validity of the UCA and USLA measurements was rigorously analyzed by comparing them against established radiographic benchmarks, utilizing Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots for comprehensive evaluation. All expected or unexpected adverse events from this study will be recorded and monitored.For comprehensive analysis, participants were systematically categorized based on multiple demographic and clinical parameters: coronal angle (either ≥20° or <20°), gender (male or female), age (either>14 years or ≤14 years), and nutritional status (classified as normal or abnormal).

Enrollment: 80 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients with IS who were cooperative with ultrasound procedures.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with spinal disorders such as Marfan's syndrome, a history of ankylosing spondylitis, or spinal neurofibroma.
• Patients with severe medical or psychiatric conditions that could potentially impact the study results.