Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment in the treatment of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) (i.e. > or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause mortality.
Our secondary aim is to compare clinical failure rates of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment and to compare time to microbiological clearance in patients treated with daptomycin versus those treated with vancomycin.
Our primary hypothesis is that Daptomycin treatment is superior to vancomycin treatment in reducing mortality from BSIs due to MRSA with high vancomycin MIC from 25% to 10%.
Full description
Introduction/Clinical Significance Vancomycin is the standard first-line treatment for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. In recent years however, there has been an increase in the number of MRSA isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Recent consensus guidelines recommend clinicians consider using alternative agents such as daptomycin for MRSA infection when the vancomycin MIC is greater than 1 ug/ml. To date however, there has been no head to head randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the treatment of blood stream infections (BSIs) due to MRSA with high vancomycin MICs.
Specific Aims:
Our primary aim is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment in the treatment of MRSA BSIs due to isolates with high vancomycin MICs (i.e. > or equal to 1.5 ug/mL) in terms of reducing all-cause mortality.
Our secondary aim is to compare clinical failure rates of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment and to compare time to microbiological clearance in patients treated with daptomycin versus those treated with vancomycin.
Hypothesis:
Daptomycin treatment is superior to vancomycin treatment in reducing mortality from BSIs due to MRSA with high vancomycin MIC from 25% to 10%.
Methodology We will conduct a prospective open label randomized controlled phase 2B pilot study in 3 major Singaporean hospitals, with balanced treatment assignments within each hospital achieved by permuted block randomization. There will be 21 subjects per arm, with the control arm receiving vancomycin and the experimental arm receiving daptomycin. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment in the treatment of MRSA BSIs due to isolates with high vancomycin MICs (i.e. > or equal to 1.5 ug/mL) in terms of reducing all-cause mortality 60 days from positive index blood culture. Secondary outcomes include rates of clinical failure, time to microbiological clearance, and rates of nephro- and muscular toxicities in both arms.
If the pilot study proves our hypothesis that indeed , we aim to proceed with a larger scale trial
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Allergy to any of the study medications.
Pregnant or breastfeeding females.
Unable to provide consent or have no legally authorized representatives.
Currently enrolled or within the past three months participated in an interventional antibiotic or vaccine trial.
>48 hours after MRSA vancomycin MIC > or equal to1.5 ug/ml confirmation by the microbiology laboratory (assessed from time of lab report).
Patients on palliative care or with less than 24 hours of life expectancy (as discussed with their primary physicians).
Polymicrobial bacteremia [see (a) below].
Pneumonia [see (b) below].
On treatment with linezolid, tigecycline or ceftaroline immediately prior to enrolment.
Previous blood cultures positive for MRSA in the preceding one month.
On vancomycin or daptomycin treatment for more than 96 hours prior to enrolment.
BSI due to MRSA with vancomycin MIC > or equal to 4 ug/ml.
Baseline serum creatine kinase more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
Patients with prosthetic heart valves
Any other significant condition that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or outcome in the trial.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
14 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal