Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to observe insights into the benefits of Varithena compared to Endothermal Ablation (ETA) in the treatment of the great saphenous vein.
Full description
To collect comparative evidence on patient reported outcomes of Varithena compared to ETA when used to treat the incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV). ETA will include either radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation according to the site's standard practice. To provide long term (1-year, 2-year, and 3-year) outcomes.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
43 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Timothy Keo; Sharon Mensah
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal