Velocity Time Integral vs PICCO for Evaluation of Passive Leg Raising in Septic Shock (VIPS)

Region Skane

Status: Withdrawn

Conditions: Septic Shock

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03621449

RegionSkane ICU 1

Details and patient eligibility

About

The objective of the present study is to investigate accuracy of changes in cardiac output following passive leg raising as estimated by transthoracic ultrasound as method to predict fluid responsiveness and compare that to changes in cardiac output following PLR as estimated by calibrated pulse contour analysis as method to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.

Full description

One method to predict fluid responsiveness is to increase preload by transferring blood from the lower extremities to the central compartment through a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver and then measure the resulting change in cardiac output. It was recently suggested that an increase in cardiac output following PLR had a high accuracy compared other methods to test fluid responsiveness. Different methods to estimate change in cardiac output have been used in studies investigating accuracy of PLR. Most commonly calibrated pulse contour analysis has been used in mechanically ventilated patients whereas transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)has been used in spontaneously breathing patients. While TTE offers the advantage of being less invasive than calibrated pulse contour analysis it is technically challenging and user dependent and the accuracy of the two methods has not been compared.

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Septic shock according to the sepsis-3 criteria
2. The treating physician plans to administer fluid to improve organ perfusion and oxygenation due to signs of inadequate organ perfusion and hypoxia (skin mottling, tachycardia (>100), urine output below 0.5 ml/kg/h, lactate persistently > 2 mmol/l and central venous oxygen saturation < 70%, increasing doses of vasoconstrictors to maintain mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg.
3. Hemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution initiated as part of routine clinical monitoring.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any condition that will affect the reliability of the PLR procedure or is a contraindication to PLR (compression stockings or intraabdominal pressure > 12 mm Hg, raised intracranial pressure).
2. PaO2/FiO2 < 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa) or suspicion of cardiogenic edema
3. Transthoracic echo does not allow recording of VTI.
4. Age >18 years.
5. No informed consent
6. Prior inclusion in the study