Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study will compare aggressive antiarrhythmic therapy to catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients who have suffered prior myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the optimal management of patients presenting with recurrent VT and receiving ICD therapy in spite of first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The hypothesis is catheter ablation is superior to aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy for recurrent VT.
Full description
This is a multicentre, parallel group, two arm, unblinded, randomized clinical trial to compare two management strategies for patients with ischemic heart disease and recurrent ICD therapy despite at least one antiarrhythmic drug. The primary endpoint will be a composite of appropriate ICD shocks or death.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Prior Myocardial Infarction
An implantable defibrillator
One of the following VT events (within the past 3 months):
"Failed" first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy as defined by one of:
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
260 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal