ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Versus Partial Extraction Therapy

H

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Status

Completed

Conditions

Dental Implants

Treatments

Procedure: class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Partial Extraction Therapy
Procedure: Class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Vestibular Socket Therapy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05112796
VST_PET_20

Details and patient eligibility

About

The current randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the VST versus Partial Extraction Therapy (PET) for immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone in class I fresh extraction sites.

The primary outcome was the assessment of vertical dimensional changes in peri-implant soft tissue margin.

The secondary outcome was the assessment of radiographic changes in the thickness of the facial peri-implant tissues.

Enrollment

16 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • single hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone
  • non-smokers
  • systemically healthy
  • Class I extraction sites

Exclusion criteria

  • smoking
  • Class II and III extraction sites
  • hopeless teeth with acute infection or vertical/horizontal root fracture

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

16 participants in 2 patient groups

VST technique
Experimental group
Treatment:
Procedure: Class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Vestibular Socket Therapy
PET technique
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Procedure: class I extractions sites received immediate implants using the Partial Extraction Therapy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems