Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the acute effects of virtual reality-based relaxation (immersive VR relaxation) and exergaming (non-immersive VR) compared to traditional Jacobson's relaxation on symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea (PD) in women aged 18-30 years with regular menstrual cycles. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does immersive VR relaxation reduce abdomino-pelvic pain and menstrual symptom severity more effectively than Jacobson's relaxation? Does non-immersive VR exergaming provide better pain relief and symptom management compared to traditional relaxation methods?
Hypotheses:
Immersive VR relaxation will result in significantly greater reductions in abdomino-pelvic pain and menstrual symptom severity compared to traditional relaxation.
Non-immersive VR exergaming will also provide better outcomes in pain and symptom management compared to traditional relaxation.
Researchers will compare immersive VR relaxation, non-immersive VR exergaming, and Jacobson's relaxation (control group) to determine the relative effectiveness of each intervention.
Participants will:
Engage in a 20-minute session of one of the assigned interventions. Complete questionnaires on abdomino-pelvic pain, menstrual symptoms, and perceived effectiveness.
Participate in follow-up assessments for sleep quality during menstruation. This study aims to explore innovative, technology-driven approaches for managing menstrual symptoms and their effectiveness relative to traditional methods.
Full description
This study seeks to address this gap by investigating whether these innovative approaches can provide superior symptom relief. By evaluating pain intensity, symptom severity, and perceived effectiveness, this research will provide valuable insights into the feasibility and advantages of integrating technology into dysmenorrhea management.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
43 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal