We Are Here Now: a Multi-level, Multicomponent Sexual and Reproductive Health Intervention for American Indian Youth (NE)
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Details and patient eligibility
About
N/E is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) multi-level, multi-component sexual and reproductive health (SRH) intervention, constructed on Ecological Systems Theory. N/E is based on Fort Peck tribal members' desire to implement a holistic SRH intervention for American Indian youth. N/E includes: 1) A school-based SRH curriculum called Native Stand, designed to address individual-level factors that lead to sexual risk behaviors; 2) a family-level curriculum called Native Voices, tailored to increase communication between adult family members and youth about SRH topics; 3) a cultural mentoring component at the community level that pairs American Indian youth with adults and elders to discuss traditional American Indian beliefs and practices about SRH; and 4) a mobilizing strategy to activate a multi-sectoral network of youth-servicing organizations at the systems level in Fort Peck to coordinate SRH services for American Indian youth. The overarching aim of this proposal is to refine, tailor, and finalize the components of N/E and evaluate its efficacy. We will use a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge design (SWD), in which 5 schools that American Indian youth from Fort Peck attend are the clusters to be randomized into the intervention 1 at a time, with all schools eventually being randomized to the intervention. The 5 schools are located in separate communities, mitigating the potential for cross-contamination. N/E is a 5-year study involving 456 14- to 18-year-old American Indian youth.
Full description
N/E is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) multi-level, multi-component sexual and reproductive health (SRH) intervention, constructed on Ecological Systems Theory. N/E is based on Fort Peck tribal members' desire to implement a holistic SRH intervention for American Indian youth. N/E includes: 1) A school-based SRH curriculum called Native Stand, designed to address individual-level factors that lead to sexual risk behaviors; 2) a family-level curriculum called Native Voices, tailored to increase communication between adult family members and youth about SRH topics; 3) a cultural mentoring component at the community level that pairs American Indian youth with adults and elders to discuss traditional American Indian beliefs and practices about SRH; and 4) a mobilizing strategy to activate a multi-sectoral network of youth-servicing organizations at the systems level in Fort Peck to coordinate SRH services for American Indian youth. The overarching aim of this proposal is to refine, tailor, and finalize the components of N/E and evaluate its efficacy. We will use a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge design (SWD), in which 5 schools that American Indian youth from Fort Peck attend are the clusters to be randomized into the intervention 1 at a time, with all schools eventually being randomized to the intervention. The 5 schools are located in separate communities, mitigating the potential for cross-contamination. N/E is a 5-year study involving 456 14- to 18-year-old American Indian youth.
Our specific aims are:
AIM 1: Refine, tailor, and finalize the components of N/E. Our community advisory board and the Fort Peck-based and MSU-based research team will design culturally appropriate adaptations for N/E's 4 levels during the first year of the study, based on the analysis of our recently completed qualitative and quantitative research (focus groups, interviews, and surveys), as well as discussions with elders and community stakeholders.
AIM 2: Test the efficacy of N/E for 14- to 18-year-old American Indian youth. Our hypotheses are:
H1: American Indian youth who participate in N/E will demonstrate increased condom use at 3, 9, and 12 months. (12 months will be used in the Primary Outcome analysis; 3 and 9 months will be used in the Secondary Outcomes analysis.) H2: American Indian youth who participate in N/E will demonstrate increased use of other birth control at 3, 9, and 12 months. They also will demonstrate a decrease in sexual risk behaviors as measured by reduced number of sex partners, delayed onset of sexual intercourse, and decreased substance use during sex, at 3, 9, and 12 months. (Secondary Outcomes) H3: N/E parents/legal guardians and youth will demonstrate significantly increased communication about topics related to SRH at 3, 9, and 12 months. American Indian youth who participate in the cultural mentoring program will demonstrate significantly increased understanding of cultural values related to traditional American Indian beliefs regarding SRH at 3, 9, and 12 months. And American Indian youth who participate in N/E will report significantly increased use of SRH services at 3, 9, and 12 months as a result of improved coordination among education, health care, and social service agencies on the Fort Peck Reservation. (Tertiary Outcomes) AIM 3: Evaluate the fidelity and acceptability of N/E. N/E's fidelity and acceptability will be evaluated using qualitative methods, including focus groups, activity logs, and staff field notes and meetings.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
- 14 to 18 years old
- a registered member of a federally recognized tribe or an associate tribal member
- a resident of Fort Peck with a parent/legal guardian. Exclusion criteria are minimal due to the CAB's value of inclusion in the intervention.
- For inclusion in the systems-level component of the intervention, only those staff members who sit on the Epi Team as representatives of their respective agencies are eligible.
Exclusion criteria
- not meeting the aforementioned inclusion criteria
- having a medically identified physical or cognitive impairment that would impede their understanding of and participation in the educational content and activities of Native Stand, Native Voices, and the cultural mentoring program.
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
453 participants in 5 patient groups
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Central trial contact
Elizabeth Rink, PhD; Marissa Cheplick, MPH
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal