Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The increasing incidence of diabetes and high risk of amputation makes prevention and successful treatment of DFU of vital importance. A relatively new device, the wheeled knee walker, allows total offloading of the affected foot and, when compared to traditional walking aids such as crutches and walkers, requires significantly less physical exertion, is easier to use, and affords more stability. Its potential benefit to improve wound healing, impact physical function and quality of life in people with DFU is not yet known. Therefore, the goal of this research is to determine whether providing a wheeled knee walker to people with diabetic foot ulcers improves clinical outcomes and quality of life when compared to usual and customary care.
Full description
The rate of diabetes in Saskatchewan is among the highest of all Canadian provinces with a prevalence of 8.5% in 2015 with an expected rise to 11.1% in 2025. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a common complication and the leading cause of lower limb amputation worldwide. Treatment for DFU include casts, braces, crutches and walkers to remove pressure (offload) from the ulcer. These interventions, when not rejected, foster a sedentary lifestyle which negatively impacts function and quality of life. Also, crutches and walkers may increase risk of ulceration of the sound foot as the arms are often not strong enough to support the body weight when stepping.
The wheeled knee walkers (WKW) is a relatively new walking aid that allows total offloading of one foot, requires less physical exertion, and is more stable than crutches or walkers. The purpose of this research is to determine if a WKW would improve wound healing, quality of life, and physical function while decreasing the risk of sound foot ulceration in people with DFU. To explore these objectives we will recruit people with DFU who are under the care of a vascular surgeon, perform standardized baseline measures for each objective, provide a WKW to half of the participants and then re-evaluate all objectives at 6 and 12 weeks. The results will help guide treatment and inform decision making to optimize care. Further, the project will establish an interdisciplinary collaborative research program for future projects to improve health and advance knowledge.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
68 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Audrey R Zucker-Levin, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal