Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
RATIONALE: It is not yet know whether white wine is more effective than a nutritional supplement in improving appetite.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying white wine to see how well it works compared with a nutritional supplement in improving appetite in patients with cancer
Full description
OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare white wine (Arm A) to non-wine nutritional supplement (Arm B) for the treatment of cancer-associated anorexia.
II. To evaluate the side effect profile of white wine (Arm A).
OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to primary malignant disease (lung vs gastrointestinal vs other [specify]), severity of weight loss (excluding peri-operative weight loss) within the past 2 months (< 4.6 kg [< 10 lbs] vs >= 4.6 kg [>= 10 lbs]), age (< 50 years vs >= 50 years), and planned concurrent chemotherapy or radiation (yes vs no).
Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients consume white wine with =< 15% alcohol content twice daily for 3-4 weeks.
ARM B: Patients receive an oral non-wine nutritional supplement (e.g., Boost or Ensure) twice daily for 3-4 weeks.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 6 months for 2 years.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
140 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal