ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

XILO-FIST, the Effect of Allopurinol on the Brain Heart and Blood Pressure After Stroke

NHS Trust logo

NHS Trust

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Ischaemic Stroke

Treatments

Drug: Placebo
Drug: Allopurinol

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02122718
GN12MT494
TSA BHF 2013/01 (Other Grant/Funding Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Recurrent stroke and cognitive decline are common after ischaemic stroke. Allopurinol, a drug usually used to treat gout, has been shown to reduce heart ischaemia, heart size, and arterial stiffness and to relax brain blood vessels and may reduce the blood pressure. All of these properties may be associated with a lower risk of second stroke and cognitive decline. We now aim to explore whether allopurinol will reduce further damage to the brain (called white matter hyper-intensities) after stroke and also whether it reduces heart size and blood pressure after stroke.

We will conduct a multi-centre randomised, double-blind placebo controlled study to investigate whether two years allopurinol 300 mg twice per day (BD) improves these 3 outcomes, which are inextricably linked to risk of recurrence and cognitive decline after ischaemic stroke.

Full description

New strategies are needed to improve long-term outcomes after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Approximately 13% of participants suffered recurrent stroke in recent secondary preventative trials , 40% of patients with TIA experience recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events during long-term follow up and there is an additional substantial burden from incident post-stroke dementia (~ 10% after first stroke and higher still after recurrent events) , cognitive decline (over 30%) and decline in physical function. Improving these outcomes is a recognised priority area for stroke research (as identified by stroke survivors through the recent James Lind Alliance priority setting workshops ).

Such adverse outcomes are particularly common in those with brain white matter hyper-intensities (WMH) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) . WMH are seen in as many as 90% of patients with ischaemic stroke , , are at least moderately severe in 50%6 and such 'severe' WMH are associated with substantially higher stroke recurrence rates (43% in one study)6, death and increased cognitive and physical decline. The burden of WMH increases during longitudinal follow up and this is associated with increased incident stroke, dementia and cognitive decline5. In the longitudinal population based Rotterdam scan study, 39% of elderly participants had WMH progression (over a mean period of 3.4 years) , as did 50% in the recent PROFeSS MRI sub-study (over 2 years)7 and 74% (over 3 years) in the Leukoariosis and Disability study (LADIS) .Similarly, silent brain infarction (SBI) is also associated with recurrent stroke and 14% developed incident infarcts on brain MRI in the Rotterdam scan study9. Thus, treatments that reduce WMH progression and incident silent brain infarction could have potentially profound effects on a variety of outcomes after stroke including cognition, functional outcome and recurrent stroke.

The pathological basis for WMH development and progression is poorly understood. Post mortem studies show presence of varied pathologies including demyelination, infarction, arteriosclerosis and breakdown of the blood-brain barrier. Key risk factors for development and progression of WMH are age, arterial hypertension and previous stroke9 and associations with other cardiovascular risk factors and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have been demonstrated . Blood pressure (BP) lowering reduces WMH progression, as demonstrated by the PROGRESS MRI sub-study . In the PROFeSS MRI sub-study WMH progression was unaffected by the angiotensin receptor blocker telmisartan7 but unlike PROGRESS, there was no significant difference in BP between groups. In addition, WMH are less clearly related to hypertension in older patients with established cardiovascular disease meaning that novel strategies which reduce WMH progression and SBI would be particularly promising in this group.

The association between WMH and LVH is of particular interest; it appears independent of arterial BP , and may be mediated by aortic stiffness . There are additional potential mechanisms for this association (e.g., LVH is the strongest predictor of left atrial appendage thrombi, stronger than any left atrial parameter) . Regression of LVH is associated with reduced risk of stroke. In a recent meta-analysis of 14 studies in 12,809 patients, LVH regression was independently associated with a 25% reduction in future strokes, whereas the composite endpoint of CV events/mortality was only 15% lower . Similar findings were seen in the LIFE echo sub-study which utilised measures of left ventricular mass (LVM) . LVH regression is thus a promising therapeutic target in devising new ways to prevent strokes, especially if the same treatment were found to reduce WMH.

Enrollment

464 patients

Sex

All

Ages

50+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Ischaemic Stroke/ Ischaemic lesion on brain imaging in relevant anatomical territory in patients with transient ischaemic attack.
  • Age greater than 50 years. -- Consent within one month of stroke.

Exclusion criteria

  • Modified Rankin scale score of 5 (at end of the possible enrolment window of one month after stroke).
  • Diagnosis of dementia (defined as a documented diagnosis or a screening Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) score of 3.6 or more).
  • Cognitive impairment deemed sufficient to compromise capacity to consent or to comply with the protocol (in the opinion of the local investigator).
  • Dependent on daily help from others for basic or instrumental activities of daily living prior to stroke (defined as assistance needed with toileting, walking or dressing).
  • Significant co-morbidity or frailty likely to cause death within 24 months or likely to make adherence to study protocol difficult for participant (in the opinion of the local investigator).
  • Contra-indication to or indication for administration of allopurinol (as detailed in Summary of Product Characteristics on the XILO-FIST web portal and in trial master file).
  • Concurrent azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine therapy, other cytotoxic therapies, cyclosporin, theophylline and didanosine.
  • Significant hepatic impairment (defined as serum bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine transaminase (ALT) greater than three times upper limit of normal (ULN)).
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate < 30 mls/min
  • Contraindication to MRI scanning.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Women of childbearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use contraception.
  • Prisoners.
  • Active participation in another Clinical Trial of Investigational Medicinal Product (CTIMP) or device trial or participation within the past month.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

464 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Allopurinol
Experimental group
Treatment:
Drug: Allopurinol
Placebo
Placebo Comparator group
Treatment:
Drug: Placebo

Trial contacts and locations

21

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems