Comparison of TAVR With SAVR in Younger Low Surgical Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (NOTION-2)

Ole De Backer

Status: Active, not recruiting

Conditions: Ventricular Outflow Obstruction; Heart Valve Diseases; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Heart Diseases

Treatments: Device: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Device: Surgical aortic valve replacement

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; Industry

Identifiers

NCT02825134

H-15019580

Details and patient eligibility

About

A randomized clinical trial investigating transcatheter (TAVR) versus surgical (SAVR) aortic valve replacement in patients 75 years of age or younger suffering from severe aortic valve stenosis.

Study hypothesis: The clinical outcome (death of any cause, stroke and rehospitalization (related to the procedure, valve or heart failure)) obtained within one year after TAVR is non-inferior to SAVR.

Full description

BACKGROUND: Acquired aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most common heart valve disease in the Western World with a prevalence of 2-7% at the age of >65 years. If untreated, it may lead to heart failure and death. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) until recent years has been the definitive treatment for patients with severe symptomatic AS. A less invasive transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been developed and has been a treatment of choice mostly for elderly high risk or inoperable patients. As TAVR technology is continuously evolving and improving, it may be anticipated that it will become a valuable alternative - and even the preferred choice of treatment - for younger, low-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis in the near future. However, to date, there is no clinical evidence that supports this hypothesis.

AIM: The purpose of the study is to compare TAVR and SAVR with regard to the intra- and post-procedural morbidity and mortality rate, hospitalization length, functional capacity, quality of life, and valvular prosthesis function in younger, low risk patients with severe bicuspid or tricuspid AS, scheduled for aortic valve replacement.

POPULATION: Younger low risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, which are scheduled for aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis. Subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria, not having any exclusion criteria, and consenting to the trial will be randomized 1:1 to TAVR or SAVR with 186 patients in each group.

DESIGN: The study is a randomized clinical multicenter trial. Central randomization with variable block size and stratification by gender and coronary comorbidity will be used. An independent event committee blinded to treatment allocation will adjudicate safety endpoints.

INTERVENTIONS:

TAVR: Any CE-Mark approved transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis may be used in the study, and the choice is at the discretion of the local TAVR team. The transfemoral TAVR procedure may be performed under general anaesthesia, local anaesthesia/conscious sedation, or local anesthesia. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be performed up to 30 days prior to TAVR or as a hybrid procedure.

SAVR: The surgical SAVR technique follows standard protocol of the local department of cardio-thoracic surgery. The operation is performed under general anesthesia, which follows standard protocol of the department of anesthesiology. A commercial available surgical aortic bioprosthesis at the surgeons discretion will be implanted. Concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may be performed.

END POINTS: The primary endpoint is the composite rate of death of any cause, stroke and rehospitalization (related to the procedure, valve or heart failure) within one year after the procedure. Secondary endpoints are listed below. Follow-up will be performed after 1 and 12 months and yearly thereafter for a minimum of 10 years.

Enrollment: 376 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 75 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age 75 years or younger.
• Severe calcific AS (Valve area <1cm2 (or <0.6 cm2/m2) AND one of the two following criteria: mean gradient >40mmHg or peak jet velocity >4.0m/s, OR in presence of low flow, low gradient with reduced or normal LVEF<50%, a dobutamine stress echo should verify true severe AS rather than pseudo-AS
• Symptomatic with angina pectoris, dyspnea or exercise-induced syncope or near syncope OR asymptomatic with abnormal exercise test showing symptoms on exercise clearly related to AS or systolic LV dysfunction (LVEF <50%) not due to another cause.
• Anticipated usage of biological aortic valve prosthesis.
• Low risk for conventional surgery (STS Score <4%).
• Suitable for both SAVR and transfemoral TAVR.
• Life expectancy >1 year after the intervention.
• Informed consent to participate in the study after adequate information about the study before randomization and intervention.

Exclusion criteria

• Coronary artery disease, not suitable for both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
• Coronary angiogram with a SYNTAX-score >22.
• LVEF <25% without contractile reserve during dobutamine stress echocardiography.
• Porcelain aorta, which prevents open-heart surgery.
• Bicuspid valve with aorta ascendens diameter ≥45mm
• Severe femoral, iliac or aortic atherosclerosis, calcification, coarctation, aneurysm or tortuosity, which prevents transfemoral TAVR.
• Need for open heart surgery other than SAVR with or without CABG.
• Myocardial infarction within last 30 days
• Stroke or TIA within the last 30 days. NOTION-2, 01. February 2017, version 5 9
• Current endocarditis, intracardiac tumor, thrombus or vegetation.
• Ongoing severe infection requiring intravenous antibiotics.
• Unstable pre-procedural condition requiring intravenous inotropes or mechanical assist device (IABP, Impella) on the day of intervention.
• Kidney disease requiring dialysis or severely impaired lung function (FEV1 and/or diffusion capacity <40% of predicted).
• Allergy to heparin, iodid contrast agent, warfarin, aspirin or clopidogrel.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

376 participants in 2 patient groups

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Experimental group

Description:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Treatment:

Device: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Surgical aortic valve replacement

Active Comparator group

Description:

Surgical aortic valve replacement

Treatment:

Device: Surgical aortic valve replacement